Time... 时间?


资料来源:维基百科。

这是一个 在基督教世界中这个特殊的星期日,思想上很有趣。复活节让我想到重生,这与“复活”的概念密不可分 时间. Maybe for this reason 时间 was on my mind this morning, a question ringing in my head as I still lay in bed: Does 时间 really exist?

We divide 时间 logically into three segments: 过去, 当下 and 未来. It is fairly straightforward to conclude that 过去 and 未来 do not really exist but as notions 在我们心中。 After all, the 过去 is but a 记忆, while the 未来 is but an 期望. Only the 当下 stands a chance of being really 'out there.' This much is pretty clear, isn't it? So only through the 当下 can 时间 be said to be real. But where precisely is the 当下?

We could say that the 当下 is today, while the 过去 is yesterday and the 未来 is tomorrow. Yesterday is a 记忆 and tomorrow is an 期望, so both exist only in mind. But today is really there, isn't it? Well, if you come to think of it, today is quite a long period of 时间. Within today there is last hour, this hour, and next hour. Last hour and next hour only exist in mind. Only this hour is really there. Or is it? After all, within this hour there is last minute, this minute and next minute. Well, you know where I am going with this.

You could say that the 当下 is a very short moment squeezed in between a growing 过去 and an approaching 未来. But even that would be too generous to the 当下: it isn't merely very short; 它比您可以说的要短, because any period of 时间, of any length whatsoever, would still contain 过去 and 未来. The 当下 is 无限地 简短,所以它不是真的在那里。 If you try to pin down the 当下 moment by saying 'Now!', by the 时间 your mouth begins to move to say it, it's already gone into the 过去 and exists merely as a 记忆. The conclusion is inescapable: the 当下 doesn't exist but as an 理念 在我们心中。

So we find ourselves arriving at an interesting conclusion: the 过去 is a 记忆; the 当下 is an 理念; the 未来 is an 期望. They all exist merely in mind. None of them is real in the sense of really being 'out there.' And since there is nothing to 时间 but 过去, 当下 and 未来, clearly 时间 doesn't exist 'out there,' but is merely a mental construct. Mind invents 时间.

No, really, 时间 is merely an invention of mind. What else could it be?

复活节快乐!
分享:

18条评论:

  1. I think the 当下 is the most real, because however 无限地 small it is, it is only in the 当下 that anything can actually happen.
    -布莱恩

    回复删除
    回覆
    1. Notice that my argument is that 时间 is in mind, instead of being 'out there'...不是说没有't以任何形式存在。 ;)从这个意义上说,我同意你的看法。

      删除
    2. 精彩的思想吹动。贝尔纳多。谢谢!

      The timing of this blog entry is perfect for me. Yesterday, April 19, 2014, so to speak, I found a portal into Mind and out of 时间.

      还有其他能量场正好从思维开始的地方开始,其他一切都消失了。我们认为作为物质,形式,这个世界至关重要的所有其他一切,仅仅是我们正在做出的确切的投射(幻觉)。

      我经历了这一点,并分享了这一经历。

      不,我没有食用蘑菇或酸:-)

      这不是涅rv,这是替代能源领域。实际上,我很犹豫不愿接受它,因为您可以't see BOTH "worlds"。即使是疯狂和虚幻的事物,也很难放手。

      但是我 '我对即将发生的事情有一点点品味。 Bodhotsava牵着我(精神)的手,带领我穿过一个传送门。

      我现在可以通过个人经验说,您的写作所指向,定义,假定和耐心解释的是现实,从定义上来说,它既是Tue又是Real。

      格雷格和我很喜欢您的最新书,"为什么唯物主义是阳台". "Magnificent!" and "Brilliant!"在我们阅读时经常会引起惊叹。毫无疑问,这是您迄今为止最好的书。

      我们感谢您的礼物,使您头脑清晰,书写技巧出色。

      凯瑟琳和格雷格·科莫斯

      删除
    3. 上面两个词自动更正为歧义:"balcony" should be "balony" and "bodhotsavva" should be "Bodhisattva".

      删除
    4. 迷惑,迷惑!确实!

      我放弃。

      删除
  2. 保罗·布伦顿(Paul Brunton)根据您的写作进行了出色的锻炼。

    整天练习,要记住,在"past" (so called 过去!) is now a 记忆 (that is, it is thoroughly mental). All that might happen in the "future" (so called 未来!) is also an 理念, in the mind.

    And most important, at each moment of the (so called) 当下, be mindful that it will also as soon as it passes be a 记忆 (thoroughly mental).

    随着更严格的实践,发生了许多事情。而不是等待"present" to pass and "then" become mental, the 当下 is more and more viscerally experienced as being of the nature of mind (or Mind, if you like).

    这种做法的一个更有力的结果是,人们开始体验到一种深刻的宁静,稳定,而不是被不断变化的潮流所带动"time" - 更改 occurs against a backdrop of utter stillness.

    万一听起来像对偶,那只是用我笨拙的话。静止和运动之间没有分隔。实际上,静止是通过每根纤维,每一个运动原子编织而成的。一个人看到,没有另一个就不可能存在。

    多么酷啊!!:>))

    回复删除
    回覆
    1. I'我承认一个秘密的弱点:我在经验上实现了我深信不疑的事物时遇到困难。因此,这对我来说可能是一项极好的练习……将尝试。谢谢,唐!

      删除
  3. 时间是一种幻想,过马路需要时间吗?花费尽可能多的时间,如果您只是站在那里,那么时间就不能完成工作!它需要(能量)运动,我们用时间来衡量这一运动,从而使独立"me",即我在8点起床,在9点吃早餐,依此类推,所以我们通过时间的测量来寻求分离的连续性(Me,I),如果没有这种测量方法,大脑就无法维持分离的幻觉,而这种幻觉是由感知到需要保护自己。宇宙没有空间,没有时间(一个没有另一个就不可能存在),它只是能量的永恒运动,永恒和因果关系。'以视觉为例-简单的刺激和反应-光线击中视网膜并进入大脑的信号。"me"通过评估传入的信息来保护自己,看它是否是以下三件事之一:1-威胁,2-usefull,3-被忽略,因此"me" uses "memory"(时间是昨天。.我知道's called a "tree")并投射出"tree". So, without this "me-filtering"只是能量的移动,从一种能量表达(树)移动到或通过"another" energetic expression (brain), and there is no 时间 (memory or image), space ( i am here, the 树 is there),or "me"涉及到永恒的作为能量的意识奇观,以及能量自由运动的自发表述……用文字无法形容这种意识,我可以用语言来形容……。

    回复删除
  4. 介意不'创造时间,而不是直接创造时间。思维创造改变。变化创造时间。变化是这里的根本,变化绝对是真实的。时间只是一个可以对变更进行结构化,形式化,度量,比较,标准化等过程。时间是一个非常琐碎但非常有用的过程。改变是根本。当前时刻是真实的,仅仅因为它是单个时间点就不会't mean it isn'真实的。无量纲的点是真实而有意义的描述。意识创造变化。变化是主要现象,没有变化就不会发生。时间就是应对变化的有用工具。变革是生存和经验以及学习和生活的基础。这绝不是幻想。

    回复删除
    回覆
    1. If only the 当下 is real, 然后 there is no 时间 as such. Time, as a concept, requires more than an infinitesimally small point of itself. Therefore, I think I actually agree with you, without contradicting what I wrote int he essay. :)

      删除
  5. 这个论点就像Zenon的论点一样,只是关于时间,而不是空间,但是在我看来这是一个谬误的论点。该论点假设现在可以无限分割,但是这个假设可能是错误的。实际上,量子物理学指出,存在不可分割的时刻,即Planch单位,它独立于我们的思维而存在。因此,存在仅存在于我们脑海中是不正确的。

    Also the 过去 and the 未来 can not be at same level because intuitively we think that the 过去 is more real than the 未来, but this would lead us too far.

    回复删除
    回覆
    1. I see 芝诺n as just a bit of fun with confusing our real experience with the properties of a diagram. Really, the 时间 we experience isn'在图表上画一条线-这是空间或时间可分割的唯一意义:重新表示之后。我们实际上不'完全没有时间;我们经历 更改.

      普朗克时间-"从理论上讲,这是有史以来最小的时间测量"。它确实确实存在于我们的脑海中,就像时间表的图表一样。当被问及时,它本身可能成为大多数人的代表过去'to their left'和未来'to their right'. If the theory 更改d, the notion of the planck 时间 would 更改 or disappear. Our diagrams would 更改, but our experience wouldn't.

      有趣的是,这种时间可视化是与文化相关的:其他文化的时间从前到后,其过去在其后,未来在前,但被当前所遮盖。这可能更符合我们的实际经验。我不知道从中得出什么科学方法?

      删除
    2. 泽农悖论的重点是说阿喀琉斯永远不可能接管乌龟,这当然是错误的。悖论中的谬误是一个隐含的假设,即无限的步骤需要无限的时间来执行。阿基里斯确实接管了乌龟,因为他在有限的时间内执行了无限的步伐。那和我的论文有什么关系?它没有'真的。即使是关于木板的争论'常数是一个理论上的抽象,而不是经验上的现实。我们不't真正体验时间(正如其他人所说的,只是改变,尽管定义起来很棘手'change'没有时间,所以我赢了'不要进入那个蜂箱)。因此,时间是't really real.

      删除
    3. 芝诺's paradox relates to your essay: like 芝诺's悖论假设空间是无限可分的,而您假设时间是无限可分的,但是我认为这种假设是错误的,因为根据当前的物理学,存在最小的物理时间单位。因此,不能得出结论,时间不是真实的。

      删除
    4. 嗯我认为芝诺(Zeno)假定的是他想沦为荒谬的东西。说空间和时间是无限可分的,就是说它们不是真的。芝诺像他的大师帕门尼德斯(Parmenides)一样,似乎一直在担心确切地证明贝尔纳多的提议,即我们通常的时间和空间概念作为形而上学理论是不连贯的。 。

      删除
  6. The point of this essay is to conclude that 时间 is within consciousness and not an external thing outside of consciousness. I think the path it takes to get to this conclusion is an odd one.

    As, under 理念lism, everything is within consciousness I am not sure that a separate argument for 时间 even needs to be made. Time is the measurement of 更改 and as everything that happens is happening within consciousness 然后 更改 is happening within consciousness and so too is 时间.

    正如伯纳多(Bernardo)在其评论中指出的那样,他是'其实不是在说时间'真实的。说时间不是'真实的陈述就像说距离是无意义的一样。'是真实的,或者说60分钟或100米't real. Time is the measurement of 更改 just as distance is the measurement of space. Time and distance are the created tools of measurement of the more fundamental phenomena of 更改 and space.

    So again, as 理念lism has already put 更改 and space within consciousness, there is no requirement for a special argument for 时间.

    So now to the argument that is put forward in this essay. Firstly that the 过去 is just a 记忆 in consciousness. This is clearly not true. There is a huge difference between the 过去, what actually happened, and a 记忆 of what actually happened. There can be many memories of varying accuracy within each individual consciousness for one actual event that occurred.

    Maybe it would have been clearer if Bernardo had described how events take place in Mind and that there is no reason why Mind could not accurately and completely record everything that takes place within it. The 过去 would therefore be a record within Mind, not a 记忆 within each individual consciousness. This would satisfy the conclusion that the part of 时间 that is the 过去 is still within Mind and not an external thing, without having to imply that the 过去 is in some way illusory or unreal.

    未来可以以同样的方式解决。而不是诉诸于个人非常有限的观点'对未来的期望(可能与未来的实际发生的事件几乎没有关联),可以更合理地想象一下Mind可以对即将发生的事情具有非常强大和准确的预测能力,尤其是当它可以尽可能多地影响发生的事情。

    然后可以清晰地列出这些可能的未来,实际上是所有可能的未来,并存在于Mind中,而不是暗示未来只是对每个个体意识的有限期望的不真实幻觉。这些可能的未来甚至可以等同于量子概率,然后量子概率分解为实际发生的事情,然后变成实际的过去。

    在上面的另外两个评论中,已经解决了将当前等同于无限现实的谬误。头脑中的当下成为可能的期货崩溃成为后来成为过去的事件的那一刻。

    The existence within Mind of possible 未来s would explain not only the ability of some to predict the 未来, but also why so many get it wrong; they see a possible 未来 that never manifests.

    回复删除
  7. The point about 更改 seems important. If 更改 can only occur in the 当下, 然后 it cannot occur at all. Ergo, Parmenides and 芝诺 were right, 更改 must be reduced for a fundamental theory.

    回复删除